🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils is set to be cut by over 50%, following a controversial law change that required local governments to put the fate of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Historical Context on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include one or more elected officials depending on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the choice to vote for a assured Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, councils could only create a Indigenous seat by first putting it to a community referendum in their area. Communities frequently devoted considerable time building local support and pushing their local governments to establish Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government allowed municipal authorities to set up a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to put it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, saying communities should decide whether to establish Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation mandated councils that had established a electoral district under the previous policy to hold decisive public votes alongside the municipal polls, which ended on 11 October. Of 42 councils taking part in the referendum, 17 voted to keep their seats, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – revealing many regions opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

The results provided “a vital step in restoring community self-determination.”

Critics however have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the coalition government has ushered in sweeping rollbacks to policies intended to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has said it aims to terminate “ethnic-specific” policies, and asserts it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Māori and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the referendums were divided down city-country divisions – most urban centers mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

This year’s local government elections registered the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with less than a third of citizens participating, prompting calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are able to create other types of wards – including rural wards – without initially mandating a public vote. The disparate requirements placed on Indigenous representation suggested the government was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement concerned the 17 areas that chose to keep their seats.