🔗 Share this article

This revolution won't be broadcast, but it could have amphibious toes and large eyes.

Additionally, it could include the horn of a unicorn or a chicken's feathers.

While protests against the leadership persist in American cities, protesters have embraced the energy of a local block party. They've offered dance instruction, handed out treats, and performed on unicycles, while police observe.

Mixing humour and politics – a strategy researchers call "tactical frivolity" – is not new. However, it has emerged as a defining feature of American protest in this period, embraced by various groups.

And one symbol has emerged as especially powerful – the frog. It started when video footage of an encounter between a protester in an inflatable frog and federal officers in the city of Portland, went viral. It subsequently appeared to demonstrations throughout the United States.

"There is much happening with that humble blow-up amphibian," says a professor, a professor at UC Davis and an academic who focuses on political performance.

From the Pepe Meme to Portland

It is difficult to examine protests and frogs without talking about Pepe, an illustrated figure embraced by far-right groups throughout an election cycle.

As the meme first took off online, it was used to signal specific feelings. Subsequently, it was utilized to express backing for a candidate, including a particular image shared by that figure himself, portraying Pepe with recognizable attire and hairstyle.

The frog was also portrayed in right-wing online communities in more extreme scenarios, as a hate group member. Users traded "unique frog images" and established digital currency in his name. His catchphrase, "feels good, man", was deployed a shared phrase.

However Pepe didn't start out so controversial.

Matt Furie, artist Matt Furie, has stated about his disapproval for its appropriation. The character was intended as simply a relaxed amphibian in his series.

Pepe first appeared in an online comic in 2005 – non-political and famous for a particular bathroom habit. In a documentary, which documents the creator's attempt to take back of his work, he explained the character was inspired by his life with companions.

When he began, Mr Furie tried sharing his art to new websites, where other users began to copy, alter, and reinterpret his character. As Pepe spread into darker parts of online spaces, the creator attempted to distance himself from the frog, even killing him off in a final panel.

Yet the frog persisted.

"It proves that we don't control imagery," explains the professor. "They transform and be repurposed."

Until recently, the popularity of Pepe resulted in frogs were predominantly linked to conservative politics. A transformation occurred in early October, when an incident between a protestor wearing an inflatable frog costume and a federal agent in Portland spread rapidly online.

The moment came just days after a directive to send the National Guard to the city, which was described as "a warzone". Demonstrators began to gather in droves at a specific location, near an ICE office.

The situation was tense and an immigration officer used irritant at the individual, targeting the ventilation of the costume.

Seth Todd, the man in the costume, responded with a joke, remarking it tasted like "something milder". But the incident became a sensation.

The frog suit fit right in for the city, known for its eccentric vibe and activist demonstrations that embrace the unusual – public yoga, 80s-style aerobics lessons, and nude cycling groups. Its creed is "Embrace the Strange."

This symbol became part of in a lawsuit between the administration and Portland, which contended the use of troops was illegal.

Although the court ruled that month that the administration was within its rights to deploy troops, a minority opinion disagreed, mentioning demonstrators' "propensity for wearing chicken suits when expressing dissent."

"It is easy to see the majority's ruling, which adopts the description of Portland as a battlefield, as merely absurd," she wrote. "Yet the outcome goes beyond absurdity."

The deployment was stopped legally soon after, and personnel have reportedly departed the area.

But by then, the amphibian costume had transformed into a significant symbol of resistance for progressive movements.

The costume was seen in many cities at No Kings protests recently. Frogs appeared – and unicorns and axolotls and dinosaurs – in major US cities. They were in small towns and big international cities like Tokyo and London.

The inflatable suit was backordered on major websites, and rose in price.

Shaping the Optics

What brings the two amphibian symbols – lies in the relationship between the humorous, benign cartoon and underlying political significance. This concept is "tactical frivolity."

The tactic is based on what Mr Bogad terms a "disarming display" – usually humorous, it acts as a "disarming and charming" performance that calls attention to a cause without obviously explaining them. This is the silly outfit used, or the meme you share.

Mr Bogad is an analyst on this topic and someone who uses these tactics. He authored a text on the subject, and taught workshops around the world.

"One can look back to the Middle Ages – under oppressive regimes, absurd humor is used to express dissent indirectly and while maintaining plausible deniability."

The theory of this approach is three-fold, he says.

When protesters take on a powerful opposition, humorous attire {takes control of|seizes|influences