🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, protest has ceased to be a fundamental right. Rather, it has become a conditional permission that those in power grant or deny as they see fit. This constitutes the underlying meaning of proposed measures that the ruling administration is putting forward, which would dictate when and where protests can occur, with potential imprisonment for those who disobey these limitations.

Erosion of Civil Liberties

Earlier administrations had already undermined this essential right: the former Conservative government had given law enforcement sweeping additional powers, which international human rights organizations had censured as "serious and undue restrictions" on democratic freedoms. Collectively, these incremental attacks on liberty have practically eliminated the historically earned right to freedom of protest.

Using Atrocity to Rationalize Suppression

The most recent restrictive measures are being justified by citing last week's terrible antisemitic assault on a British Islamic center. We can all agree on universal agreement that the security of British Jews must be safeguarded. However, employing this atrocity as a justification to suppress opposition is not only disconnected to that duty but perverts it.

"When you cannot draw the line at mass killing, you probably cannot draw the line at democratic principles," commented a prominent American author, a statement that rings true for the current government.

Historical Perspective of Demonstration

Reflect on Britain's rich history of public demonstration and activism against racism and authoritarianism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to postwar Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s demonstrations against the National Front. Many of these early protesters were labeled as radicals in their era, even while they were advocating the rights of minorities.

Present Situation

In the current complicated landscape, here's what's actually occurring: Israel – a foreign state – is perpetrating what United Nations investigations have described as genocide. Its military actions have led the International Criminal Court to release legal indictments against Israel's prime minister and his ex-military leader.

Western popular sentiment has changed significantly against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a large percentage of citizens believe Israel has probably committed war crimes. Most people would support a total prohibition on arms sales to the state, and approve the arrest of Netanyahu.

Silencing Dissent

Having largely lost the argument, Israel's supporters are now seizing on a despicable antisemitic crime to try to silence a mass movement against a ethical disaster. The British government seems included in this effort. Ministers have not enacted extensive restrictions on Israel and have allowed weapon shipments to continue.

People who are demonstrating against the erasure of Gaza have been characterized as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a broader suppression on these demonstrators until now: extremely few protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities little justification to intervene.

Problematic Association

Equating Jewish heritage with the policies of the government of Israel is not only manipulative but also dangerous. The official definition of antisemitism, adopted by the British government and many organizations, has been appropriately challenged for potentially stifling legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its central illustrations: that "holding Jewish people generally accountable for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've reached a point where police authorities can suggest that demonstrations opposing Israel's policies should be called off because they might "accidentally or deliberately" support anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, political figures have stated that acknowledgment of Palestinian statehood has made organizations "complicit" in supposed mistreatment faced by British Jews.

Double Standards

On the very day as the synagogue attack, the Israel's army killed numerous of Palestinians in Gaza – increasing the terrible count from two years of ongoing violence that have taken tens of thousands of human lives. British political leaders and news organizations have hardly hidden the limited value they attach to Palestinian life. This represents one of the boldest expressions of racism in contemporary society.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already passed a dangerous threshold by banning a specific activist group, a non-violent, human rights-focused direct action organization. Thousands of British protesters have been arrested, mostly for holding placards against mass killing and supporting the proscribed group. Many of those arrested are elderly citizens; among them a retired priest and the daughter of a Holocaust survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's not difficult to see where this path leads. In the United States, political leaders helped demonize pro-Palestinian protests: a ex-political leader implied that some were "connected to" other nations, while the sitting leader characterized such protests as antisemitic. In taking these actions, they contributed to normalizing the repressive measures on such demonstrations – and on free speech in general.

Looking Ahead

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be given extensive authority to suppress opposition. What might a new administration do with this restrictive framework? Our forebears fought, endured hardship and died to secure our freedoms. We may eventually rue how easily we permitted them to slip away.